THIS IS A DEDACTED LETTER OF COMPLAINT WRITTEN TO jbp WHO HAVE BEEN HARASSING MY ADDRESS FOR WEEKS ON END. ALTHOUGH ADVISED THAT THE LADY THEY SEEK HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH IT, NOR IS SHE KNOWN TO US. I AM TOTALLY UNIMPRESSED BY THEIR THREAT TO SEND AN ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHICH WOULD SEEM NOTHING MORE THAN MAKING A THREAT WITH MENACES.
Messrs jbw Judicial Services Group DL11YN
21.08.2014
DEAR SIR OR MADAM
ref JBW 2186018.
I have received your letter dated 19th August. I note your apology for harassing me, and informing me that you have a Warrant of Control to enforce against your customer at my address. I had rather gathered that Transport London was your customer rather than ** ****** ******* . One only has your word for it that any such document is in existence. If it is then who ever issued the Warrant did so because someone had laid false evidence before them, possibly due to sloppiness rather than wilful deceit.
However having since been informed that **.****** ******* is not known at this address, instead of checking the facts for error, you chose to issue threats with menaces, to whit the attendance at my address of an Enforcement Officer. Instead of so compounding an error it might be a good idea if you were to check with the DVLA where ** ****** ******* and her motor car are registered, rather that adopt bully boy tactics with someone who is less than impressed by them. DVLA have confirmed to me that neither this person nor ****** are recorded in connection with my address under current or previous keeper details, and that copies of my correspondence have been attached to Vehicle Records.
I still have no wish to tell you my name or provide you with copies of utility bills, for I have no idea either how doing so will in any way solve your dilemma, further more there is no telling of what might become of information, that is no concern of yours.
Due to your persistence I will again report this harassment to the Enforcement Officers Association, to Transport London, and in case I have forgotten anyone post a copy of this letter on the internet.
Your
JBP.
Thursday, 21 August 2014
Tuesday, 12 August 2014
Friday, 1 August 2014
jbw Judicial Services Group
HARRASSMENT OF A WILTSHIRE ADDRESS
In the Matter of jbw Judicial Services
Group
Group
Enforcement Agents
Telephone 0844 576 3620- 0844 576 3621
PO Box 58 Darlington DL1
9AE-www.jbw.co.uk
9AE-www.jbw.co.uk
&
A Miss Sophie Charles allegedly the
owner or driver of T59DOD in respect of an alleged unpaid congestion
charge owing to London Transport in an amount of £202.00 including
fees.
(Account reference number TF64865196
Location Haymarket 19903. 17 Non payment of congestion charge.)
Location Haymarket 19903. 17 Non payment of congestion charge.)
That is all very fine , however alas
Miss Sophie Charles neither lives, nor has ever lived at the
mentioned Address in Wiltshire. It was only today when another letter
arrived which one opened in error, that I became aware of what all
the envelopes that preceded it may have contained. Several such
envelopes , duly annotated by me having already been returned to Box
58. Eventually suspecting a scam, the penultimate letter was referred
to both Messrs Experian and the Yorkshire Police among others. I was
given to understand by the Yorkshire Police that Post Box 58
Darlington didn't exist ?
Miss Sophie Charles neither lives, nor has ever lived at the
mentioned Address in Wiltshire. It was only today when another letter
arrived which one opened in error, that I became aware of what all
the envelopes that preceded it may have contained. Several such
envelopes , duly annotated by me having already been returned to Box
58. Eventually suspecting a scam, the penultimate letter was referred
to both Messrs Experian and the Yorkshire Police among others. I was
given to understand by the Yorkshire Police that Post Box 58
Darlington didn't exist ?
It seems that whether through its own
fault or not, the DVLA advised Transport Of London that the said Miss
Sophie Charles and T59DOD were housed and garaged at a false
Wiltshire Address.
fault or not, the DVLA advised Transport Of London that the said Miss
Sophie Charles and T59DOD were housed and garaged at a false
Wiltshire Address.
LONDON TRANSPORT must then have supplied false evidence to the
Northampton County Court , concerning the abode of Miss Sophie
Charles. Seemingly the Court decided in favour of London Transport.
If this whole matter is a scam
intended to extract money under false pretences. I would
willingly testify that no Court Papers have been delivered to my
address at any stage.
intended to extract money under false pretences. I would
willingly testify that no Court Papers have been delivered to my
address at any stage.
Maybe London Transport owes both the
Court and I an apology.
Court and I an apology.
On the basis that any such
testimony given to the Northampton Court was false maybe both London Transport owes both the Northampton County Court an I apologies.
To the Court if it laid false evidence and to me for the
Harassment of my address,
thereby denting its financial profile.
As I have been put to no end of
trouble concerning this matter, it is my intention to send
jbw Judicial Services Group a bill nottrouble concerning this matter, it is my intention to send
only for my wasted time and expense, but too for associating a debt
to my house, without justification. Naturally one will also be
advising the Northampton Court of the matter.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
